GA Law Links Wearing A Helmet To Motorcycle Accident Injury Compensation Claim

Dec 9, 2020

December 09, 2020 - /PressAdvantage/ - The Angell Law Firm, LLC, in Atlanta, has published a new blog post to educate readers on the importance of wearing a helmet as a preventive injury aid. It will significantly help to strengthen their motorcycle accident injury claim. Unfortunately, motorcycle accidents are 27 times more likely to end in a fatality. Given the gravity of the threat posed to motorcyclists and their passengers, wearing a helmet can make a significant difference.

Learn more at https://www.georgiainjurylawyer.com/will-not-wearing-a-helmet-affect-my-motorcycle-accident-claim/

"One of the first factors the insurance company will try to discern after a motorcycle accident is whether or not you were wearing a helmet when it occurred," states The Angell Law Firm. The blog post emphasizes the importance of motorcycle helmet use in motorcycle accident claims and suits.

The Georgia law requires motorcycle riders to wear a helmet at all times. Supporting the law, the Angell Law Firm personal injury lawyers suggest helmet use as an essential part of the claim process. Opposed to this, not wearing a motorcycle helmet could adversely affect the victim's claim, allowing the defendant's insurance company to assign fault or liability to the victim.

The role of negligence in a motorcycle accident claim helps determine liability for the accident. The whole process considers different factors, including speeding, distracted driving, driving under the influence, and citations issued at the accident scene. The party found negligent is responsible for paying for the damages. However, another critical consideration is wearing a standard helmet.

The blog post emphasizes wearing a helmet that meets national safety standards, suggesting, "Wearing a vanity helmet is as good as wearing no helmet at all."

A party can be considered at fault or negligent for not wearing a helmet. The law considers it as a breach of duty of care to others on the road.

A review of facts enables the insurance company to assign liability to each party.

The blog post gives a clear example of how the insurance company argues against paying full liability to the victim. "For example, if the driver was driving distracted while on his cell phone and crashed into you when you weren't wearing a helmet, the insurance company may say the driver is 75 percent at fault for your injuries, and you are at 25%.”

However, the personal injury lawyers state that not wearing a helmet may not always make a difference in a motorcycle accident lawsuit. However, this is only the case if there are no head injuries. That means if a victim not wearing a helmet suffers a leg or back injury in a motorcycle accident, the insurance carrier finds no valid reason to link the injuries to helmet use. This should not impact the liability of the insurance company.

An experienced Atlanta motorcycle accident lawyer would suggest an accident victim present medical evidence supporting the claim that helmet usage did not impact injuries.

With that said, the blog post stresses the need to wear a helmet. "You should know that riding without a helmet could impact your ability to pursue a personal injury claim successfully." While state law might vary from one state to another, Georgia is a comparative negligence state, with a catch.

That means a victim's claim is reduced based on their negligence in the accident. A motorcycle accident victim may be eligible for compensation only if their fault is 49% or less. They lose their right to compensation if they are 50% or more at fault.

The blog post makes it aptly clear for readers to wear a helmet at all times when riding a motorcycle to be eligible for a claim in the event of an accident. Failure to wear a helmet in a motorcycle accident can drastically reduce the victim's compensation if the other side proves that a helmet could have made a significant difference in the severity of injuries.

This is especially true in motorcycle accident claims where the victim suffers a head injury or TBI. In such cases, the insurance companies try to shift a significant part of the blame of comparative negligence onto the victim. It often becomes tough for the victim to produce substantial evidence in their fight against helmet usage arguments.

"You must prove that not wearing a helmet during your accident did not affect your injuries' seriousness," stresses the blog post, adding, "Two critical pieces of evidence that will help you prove this are your medical records and testimony from a medical expert."

It is here that a victim can depend on an experienced motorcycle accident attorney in Georgia to compile and present evidence, gather records, talk to local medical experts in the legal claims process, and provide testimonies.

The personal injury attorney will look into all pieces of evidence to bolster the victim's claim. This includes proving that a helmet would not have changed the severity of injuries.

The Angell Law Firm is committed to fighting for justice for Motorcycle Accident victims. Do not let insurance companies escape without paying the compensation one deserves. Hire an experienced attorney on one's side today.

###

For more information about The Angell Law Firm, LLC, contact the company here:

The Angell Law Firm, LLC
Bryce Angell
(770) 336-7752
[email protected]/
3391 Peachtree Rd NE UNIT 110, Atlanta, GA 30326

ReleaseID: 60039945

More News

What to consider if a company that made AI-related job cuts wants you back

Oct 30, 2026

What to consider if a company that made AI-related job cuts wants you back

NEW YORK — Companies around the world are increasingly citing artificial intelligence when slashing jobs, fueling anxiety that a lot more workers may lose their livelihoods to machines. Microsoft, Barclays Bank and supermarket chain Kroger are among the latest entries on a growing list of companies that have announced AI-related workforce reductions this year, including the elimination of jobs deemed redundant or shed to free up money for investing in the technology. But the job cuts of the AI era, which are affecting tens of thousands of people, occasionally have an epilogue. Some companies, after discovering that AI models, applications and agents don't perform as well as expected, end up rehiring laid-off workers to fill eliminated positions. It's unclear how common such reversals are, but they are happening often enough to acquire a nickname: the "AI boomerang." "Two years ago, we said, 'Would this happen?' and now we're saying, 'Yes, it is happening in real time,'" said Lucy Beaumont, a global senior vice president at SHL, a U.K.-based technology company that develops employment-related tests and tools. Hiring managers in fields including finance, marketing, law and health reported earlier this year that their companies had eliminated positions primarily because of AI or automation, only to hire again for the same or similar roles, according to recruitment and staffing firm Robert Half. The most frequently cited reasons for restoring dropped jobs included the technology needing more human oversight than anticipated and its inability to replicate institutional knowledge, the firm said. "When you need critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, institutional knowledge, those are things that AI just can't replicate," Bill Driscoll, a senior district president at Robert Half, said. "And I think that's where companies are starting to realize, 'Wow, we really do need people to do these jobs.'" Klarna, the Swedish provider of buy now, pay later services, began recruiting human customer service representatives again last year. CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski acknowledged in an interview with Bloomberg News that the company's reliance on an AI chatbot to cut costs had gone too far. In June, Ford said it had hired or promoted 350 veteran engineers after AI tools the automaker deployed to do quality control work did not perform at the expected level. "AI utilization has been an important part of our quality gains and that — along with deep technical expertise of our teams — is a powerful combination," a Ford spokesperson told The Associated Press. However, companies don't always broadcast their U-turns on shifting resources or responsibilities from employees to AI systems, Beaumont said. "Maybe their shareholders love that they did this right-sizing motion... and then they have to turn around and quietly, with their tail between their legs, admit that they weren't ready for that or they shouldn't have done that," she said. Management experts offered employment advice for workers as companies make greater use of AI tools and consider — or reconsider — their staffing needs while assessing the technology's capabilities. Rehiring suggests the invisible work of humans is not easily replaced When companies use AI to perform tasks previously done by people, they often miss the invisible work employees do beyond their formal job descriptions, said Betsy Summers, a principal analyst on the Future of Work team at market research and advisory firm Forrester. That might include sensing emotions and moods, holding impromptu meetings and putting in extra effort when feeling inspired or otherwise motivated, Summers said. "We don't know all the work that's required to do things well within the organization," she said. "The citizenship behaviors of team cohesion and team building and making sure that you have trust within your team, none of that is accounted for. So when you rip out humans who are doing that work and then expect agents to be able to then deliver exactly what humans have delivered, they are frequently mistaken." Another factor that complicates assigning more work to AI-powered tools is that company procedures for tasks such as data processing and bookkeeping are not always well documented, experts said. "Organizations are not spending enough time doing the up-front work to really truly understand workflows and where humans add value in the process," said Brooks Holtom, a professor of management at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business. In roles such as customer service, AI agents and chatbots frequently need to refer questions and complaints to a worker who can recognize emotions, assess the severity or complexity of a problem and respond creatively within established policies, Holtom said. "It's that combination of creativity but staying in the guardrail that's really hard for a machine to figure out," he said. Figure out what gives you a competitive edge as a human As companies redirect resources toward AI, current employees and those asked to come back might want to emphasize skills that complement the technology, such as emotional intelligence and sound judgment, Holtom said. "Really try to be able to articulate, what's your value proposition as a human?" Holtom said. "Don't be afraid to lean into the technology as well, and understand how to differentiate yourself from what machines do well. Embrace that, understand that, and you can become uniquely qualified to help with implementation." Empathy is a human quality that technology has not fully mastered, Beaumont said. "Think about an angry customer. They want to be listened to, they want to be heard, they really want a human on the other end of the line," Beaumont said. "Can an AI replace that right now in a way that feels meaningful to individuals? Perhaps not." Know your leverage and use caution if you're asked back Many people are understandably reluctant to return to a company that laid them off as part of a reorganization around artificial intelligence, according to Beaumont. "To come back to a business where you've been let go, replaced by AI, to be asked back to that business, your trust is gone, your psychological safety there, your relationship with the employer, and that's very, very difficult to build back," she said. Workers offered their old jobs back are asking for more money and to know how AI might impact future staffing, Beaumont said. Requesting additional training and a clear explanation of your opportunities for advancement could be part of the discussion, she said. Communicate ways you would contribute value as a returning employee, outlining a new job description "that leverages the technology but also your expertise," Holtom said. You could end up in a higher-ranking position that pays more than the one you left, he said. Before accepting an offer, seek a commitment such as a one-year renewable contract that includes a buyout clause if the job is terminated in less than a year, Holtom suggested. Don't discount the distinctly human values of motivation and curiosity, which make people efficient and effective, Summers said. "Within our societies, work serves a broader purpose than just creating value for shareholders or customers or constituents," she added. "Work serves a human purpose as well. It's the manifestation of our search for meaning and purpose. We want to contribute to our communities as human beings."

Butcher Boy earns Bib Gourmand distinction in 2027 Michelin Guide

Oct 30, 2026

Butcher Boy earns Bib Gourmand distinction in 2027 Michelin Guide

MANILA, Philippines — Butcher Boy has earned a Bib Gourmand distinction in the 2027 Michelin Guide Philippines, moving up from its Michelin-Selected status in the 2026 edition and joining a select group of restaurants recognized for serving quality food at accessible prices.  The recognition was announced during the official awarding ceremony at the Manila Marriott Hotel on Thursday, Oct. 29, attended by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  Butcher Boy was among only two restaurants promoted from the Michelin-Selected category to Bib Gourmand this year. The distinction recognizes establishments that offer good-quality food at reasonable prices.  Butcher Boy Philippines CEO Dino Chua received the award, marking another milestone for the restaurant, which has continued to establish its presence in the local dining scene.  The recognition follows the restaurant's opening of its new and expanded location at Alabang West Parade along Daang Hari Road in Muntinlupa City in 2026. Led by Chua, the move marked a new chapter for the brand, allowing it to reach more diners in southern Metro Manila while maintaining its signature contemporary Asian-fusion cuisine.  Originally founded by Michelin-starred chef Andrew Walsh of Singapore's acclaimed Cure, Butcher Boy built its following at its former Makati location before relocating to Alabang to accommodate a bigger dining space and connect with a wider community.  Its culinary approach combines Southeast Asian flavors with Western cooking techniques, offering dishes such as its signature chicken laksa dumplings, fried chicken bao, Asian tacos, pork adobo and a variety of steaks, alongside carefully crafted cocktails.  The chicken laksa dumplings were among the dishes highlighted by Michelin inspectors.  During the restaurant's grand opening, Marketing Head Aubrey S. Mojica described its concept as “where east meets west,” emphasizing that while the menu had been expanded, the restaurant remained committed to preserving the quality, atmosphere and dining experience that patrons had come to expect.  Mojica also underscored the importance of customer service, saying the restaurant's identity goes beyond its food to include the experience it provides to diners.  With its latest Michelin recognition, Butcher Boy strengthens its position in the Philippine dining scene, bringing its combination of Asian-fusion flavors, steaks and accessible dining to the Alabang community.  Butcher Boy is located at Alabang West Parade, Daang Hari Road, Muntinlupa City. For reservations, call 0939-868-0531.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.