CCHR: Parents’ Rights Form Provides Opt-Out for School Mental Health Screening

Apr 19, 2022

Los Angeles,United States - April 19, 2022 /PressCable/ —

As part of its mental health industry watchdog role, Citizens Commission its group’s Parents: Get the Facts—Know Your Rights webpage to familiarize themselves with how to protect their children from invasive mental health screening in schools. It includes a downloadable Parent’s Exemption Form Prior to Mental Health and Psychological Screening or Counseling that can be signed and provided to schools. It also provides a link to a Federal law that prohibits schools from coercing or forcing a parent to put their child on a psychotropic medication as a requisite for their remaining in class.[1]

CCHR worked with families to secure the Prohibition of Mandatory Medication Amendment in 2004 when it was discovered that parents were being threatened with criminal charges if they refused to put their school-aged child on a psychotropic drug or took them off it.

At the time, schoolchildren were being screened for depression and suicide using a “Teen Screen” questionnaire that had an 84% false positive rate that could lead to antidepressants being recommended—drugs that contained a warning they can cause suicidal behavior in teens. The screening program shut down in 2012.[2]

Allen Jones, former investigator with the Pennsylvania Office of the Inspector General, charged that screening often translates normal human emotions into symptoms of mental illness, which is driven not by genuine concern for kids, but by a profit motive. “TeenScreen was developed and promoted by persons with deep financial ties to makers of psychiatric drugs,” said Jones.[3]

Today, there is a renewed push for screening.

A New York Times article on March 23, 2020 suggested there’s a mental-health crisis among American children and asserted that “current surveys that keep tabs on various aspects of mental health in children are too slow to capture swift changes amid a national crisis” (pandemic). Therefore, “screening for depression and anxiety at schools and pediatricians’ offices will be crucial, because the symptoms associated with those conditions are easier to manage and do less damage when addressed early.”[4]

However, this belies the fact that more than 6.1 million Americans aged 0-17 are already taking psychotropic drugs with serious adverse effects that include suicide, homicidal ideation, mania and violence.[5] About 85,000 are aged one or younger, while the highest target group is aged 6-12 with 2.65 million on psychotropics.

According to IQVia prescription tracking, in 2020 among the 0-17 age group, 2,154,118 were taking antidepressants and 1,153,351 were on anti-anxiety anxiety drugs, also known as benzodiazepines and tranquilizers, that are potentially addictive within 14 days of taking them.[6] As early as 1982, a known risk of anti-anxiety drugs was potential brain damage. More than 3.1 million 0-17 year-olds are also taking psychostimulants that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) says can lead to “severe psychological or physical dependence” with some producing the same effects as cocaine.[7]

New American reported that “there is a striking connection between school shootings and psychotherapeutic drugs,” naming ten examples, also addressed in CCHR’s report Psychiatric Drugs Create Violence and Suicide.[8]

The potential damage is so prevalent that between 2005 and 2016, Congressman Ron Paul repeatedly warned that “Mandatory depression screening will endanger people’s health by increasing the use of psychotropic drugs. These drugs often have dangerous side effects…another good reason to oppose any policy that will increase reliance on these medicines.”[9]

Congressman Paul introduced the Parental Consent Act, which would keep federal funds from being used to establish or implement any universal or mandatory mental health, psychiatric, or socioemotional screening program—legislative protections that are needed now more than ever.[10]

With social media, including TikTok marketing to teens, there is an upsurge in promoting the self-identification of mental disorders that are already based on subjective opinion about symptoms, not medical science. The symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD are so broad that anyone could be labeled with it and drugged. The New York Times pointed out that “The ADHD hashtag has over 2.7 billion views on TikTok…. This is part of the platform’s broader issue of unmoderated mental health content, where videos can gain popularity regardless of accuracy.”[11]

Social media comics have been shared on the website for the same group, as well as its magazine and on its social media pages.[12] As early as 1995 the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) raised the alarm over the group actively lobbying for the use of methylphenidate (Ritalin) for children while being funded by the manufacturer of Ritalin.[13]

According to one marketing firm, the global mental health market was estimated at US$384.85 billion in 2021 and is expected to reach $560.33 billion by 2030, driving the incentive for more mental health screening.[14]

Vera Sharav of the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) has warned that mental health screening leaves “no room for individual choice—or the freedom for parents to say no to psychotropic drugs for their children. Such mandatory, government-endorsed screening programs contradict the freedoms guaranteed in a democratic society.”[15]

CCHR’s webpage for parents provides links to and recommended reading for them, their rights and information on alternatives to mind-altering prescription drugs.

Read full article here: www.cchrint.org/2022/04/18/parents-rights-form-provides-opt-out-for-school-mental-health-screening/

[1] www.cchrint.org/issues/childmentaldisorders/

[2] www.cchrint.org/2012/11/27/teenscreen-shuts-down/

[3] www.cchrint.org/2011/10/24/ron-paul-is-right-mental-screening-of-school-kids-aims-to-leave-no-child-unmedicated/

[4] www.nytimes.com/2022/03/23/magazine/mental-health-crisis-kids.html

[5] www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-drugs/drug_warnings_on_violence/

[6] www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-drugs/children-on-psychiatric-drugs/

[7] www.benzo.org.uk/indep7-10.htm; www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-drugs/children-on-psychiatric-drugs/; “Drugs of Abuse,” Drug Enforcement Administration, p. 35, www.naabt.org/documents/Drugs%20of%20abuse%20DEA.pdf

[8] www.cchrint.org/2021/01/12/study-funds-should-review-child-deaths-suicide-and-violence-from-psych-drugs/, citing: thenewamerican.com/study-psychiatric-drugs-linked-to-violent-crime/

[9] Ron Paul, “Mandatory Depression Screening is A Depressing Thought,” 7 Feb. 2016, ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2016/february/07/mandatory-depression-screening-is-a-depressing-thought/

[10] J.D. Heyes, “Ron Paul reintroduces Parental Consent Act, prohibiting federal funding for psychiatric screening of children,” Natural News, 15 Feb. 2012, www.naturalnews.com/034978_Ron_Paul_parental_consent_psychiatric_screening.html

[11] “‘No One’s Ever Talked to Me About This Before,’” New York Times, 25 May 2021, www.nytimes.com/2021/05/24/style/adhd-online-creators-diagnosis.html

[12] Ibid.

[13] www.cchrint.org/issues/psycho-pharmaceutical-front-groups/chadd/, citing: Report of the International Narcotics Control Board, 1995, www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR1995/AR_1995_E.pdf, p. 21

[14] www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mental-health-market-is-estimated-to-reach-us-560-33-bn-by-2030-driven-by-an-increase-in-prevalence-of-mental-disorders-and-rising-geriatric-population-cagr-4-43-astute-analytica-301522577.html

[15] www.cchrint.org/2016/02/11/psych-plan-for-subjective-depression-screening/ citing: ahrp.org/two-thirds-foster-care-children-in-mass-on-psych-drugs_globe-psychiatry-soviet-experience-american-fallacy/, 11 Aug. 2004

Contact Info:
Name: Amber Rauscher
Email: Send Email
Organization: Citizens Commission on Human Rights International
Address: 6616 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90028, United States
Phone: +1-323-467-4242
Website: https://www.cchrint.org

Source: PressCable

Release ID: 89073400

If you detect any issues, problems, or errors in this press release content, kindly contact [email protected] to notify us. We will respond and rectify the situation in the next 8 hours.

More News

Oct 30, 2026

Nadine Samonte, Richard Chua renew vows on 13th wedding anniversary

Nadine Samonte and her husband, Richard "Rboy" Chua, have renewed their vows on their 13th wedding anniversary!

Oct 30, 2026

Bamboo circus show tells Vietnamese village stories on Hà Nội stage

Combining bamboo circus, expressive stage movements and live music performed on more than 30 traditional musical instruments from Việt Nam’s ethnic groups, Làng Tôi transforms the simple bamboo pole into a storytelling medium.

Oct 30, 2026

What to consider if a company that made AI-related job cuts wants you back

NEW YORK — Companies around the world are increasingly citing artificial intelligence when slashing jobs, fueling anxiety that a lot more workers may lose their livelihoods to machines. Microsoft, Barclays Bank and supermarket chain Kroger are among the latest entries on a growing list of companies that have announced AI-related workforce reductions this year, including the elimination of jobs deemed redundant or shed to free up money for investing in the technology. But the job cuts of the AI era, which are affecting tens of thousands of people, occasionally have an epilogue. Some companies, after discovering that AI models, applications and agents don't perform as well as expected, end up rehiring laid-off workers to fill eliminated positions. It's unclear how common such reversals are, but they are happening often enough to acquire a nickname: the "AI boomerang." "Two years ago, we said, 'Would this happen?' and now we're saying, 'Yes, it is happening in real time,'" said Lucy Beaumont, a global senior vice president at SHL, a U.K.-based technology company that develops employment-related tests and tools. Hiring managers in fields including finance, marketing, law and health reported earlier this year that their companies had eliminated positions primarily because of AI or automation, only to hire again for the same or similar roles, according to recruitment and staffing firm Robert Half. The most frequently cited reasons for restoring dropped jobs included the technology needing more human oversight than anticipated and its inability to replicate institutional knowledge, the firm said. "When you need critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, institutional knowledge, those are things that AI just can't replicate," Bill Driscoll, a senior district president at Robert Half, said. "And I think that's where companies are starting to realize, 'Wow, we really do need people to do these jobs.'" Klarna, the Swedish provider of buy now, pay later services, began recruiting human customer service representatives again last year. CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski acknowledged in an interview with Bloomberg News that the company's reliance on an AI chatbot to cut costs had gone too far. In June, Ford said it had hired or promoted 350 veteran engineers after AI tools the automaker deployed to do quality control work did not perform at the expected level. "AI utilization has been an important part of our quality gains and that — along with deep technical expertise of our teams — is a powerful combination," a Ford spokesperson told The Associated Press. However, companies don't always broadcast their U-turns on shifting resources or responsibilities from employees to AI systems, Beaumont said. "Maybe their shareholders love that they did this right-sizing motion... and then they have to turn around and quietly, with their tail between their legs, admit that they weren't ready for that or they shouldn't have done that," she said. Management experts offered employment advice for workers as companies make greater use of AI tools and consider — or reconsider — their staffing needs while assessing the technology's capabilities. Rehiring suggests the invisible work of humans is not easily replaced When companies use AI to perform tasks previously done by people, they often miss the invisible work employees do beyond their formal job descriptions, said Betsy Summers, a principal analyst on the Future of Work team at market research and advisory firm Forrester. That might include sensing emotions and moods, holding impromptu meetings and putting in extra effort when feeling inspired or otherwise motivated, Summers said. "We don't know all the work that's required to do things well within the organization," she said. "The citizenship behaviors of team cohesion and team building and making sure that you have trust within your team, none of that is accounted for. So when you rip out humans who are doing that work and then expect agents to be able to then deliver exactly what humans have delivered, they are frequently mistaken." Another factor that complicates assigning more work to AI-powered tools is that company procedures for tasks such as data processing and bookkeeping are not always well documented, experts said. "Organizations are not spending enough time doing the up-front work to really truly understand workflows and where humans add value in the process," said Brooks Holtom, a professor of management at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business. In roles such as customer service, AI agents and chatbots frequently need to refer questions and complaints to a worker who can recognize emotions, assess the severity or complexity of a problem and respond creatively within established policies, Holtom said. "It's that combination of creativity but staying in the guardrail that's really hard for a machine to figure out," he said. Figure out what gives you a competitive edge as a human As companies redirect resources toward AI, current employees and those asked to come back might want to emphasize skills that complement the technology, such as emotional intelligence and sound judgment, Holtom said. "Really try to be able to articulate, what's your value proposition as a human?" Holtom said. "Don't be afraid to lean into the technology as well, and understand how to differentiate yourself from what machines do well. Embrace that, understand that, and you can become uniquely qualified to help with implementation." Empathy is a human quality that technology has not fully mastered, Beaumont said. "Think about an angry customer. They want to be listened to, they want to be heard, they really want a human on the other end of the line," Beaumont said. "Can an AI replace that right now in a way that feels meaningful to individuals? Perhaps not." Know your leverage and use caution if you're asked back Many people are understandably reluctant to return to a company that laid them off as part of a reorganization around artificial intelligence, according to Beaumont. "To come back to a business where you've been let go, replaced by AI, to be asked back to that business, your trust is gone, your psychological safety there, your relationship with the employer, and that's very, very difficult to build back," she said. Workers offered their old jobs back are asking for more money and to know how AI might impact future staffing, Beaumont said. Requesting additional training and a clear explanation of your opportunities for advancement could be part of the discussion, she said. Communicate ways you would contribute value as a returning employee, outlining a new job description "that leverages the technology but also your expertise," Holtom said. You could end up in a higher-ranking position that pays more than the one you left, he said. Before accepting an offer, seek a commitment such as a one-year renewable contract that includes a buyout clause if the job is terminated in less than a year, Holtom suggested. Don't discount the distinctly human values of motivation and curiosity, which make people efficient and effective, Summers said. "Within our societies, work serves a broader purpose than just creating value for shareholders or customers or constituents," she added. "Work serves a human purpose as well. It's the manifestation of our search for meaning and purpose. We want to contribute to our communities as human beings."

Oct 30, 2026

Rere Madrid marks son's first month, shares motherhood journey

Rere Madrid marked her first month as a mother as she shared a heartfelt message for her baby boy, Atlas.

Oct 30, 2026

Thanh Hóa uses digital platforms to promote local heritage

The series aims to bring local history and culture, as well as images of scenic sites, to a wider online audience.

Oct 30, 2026

Butcher Boy earns Bib Gourmand distinction in 2027 Michelin Guide

MANILA, Philippines — Butcher Boy has earned a Bib Gourmand distinction in the 2027 Michelin Guide Philippines, moving up from its Michelin-Selected status in the 2026 edition and joining a select group of restaurants recognized for serving quality food at accessible prices. The recognition was announced during the official awarding ceremony at the Manila Marriott Hotel on Thursday, Oct. 29, attended by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Butcher Boy was among only two restaurants promoted from the Michelin-Selected category to Bib Gourmand this year. The distinction recognizes establishments that offer good-quality food at reasonable prices. Butcher Boy Philippines CEO Dino Chua received the award, marking another milestone for the restaurant, which has continued to establish its presence in the local dining scene. The recognition follows the restaurant's opening of its new and expanded location at Alabang West Parade along Daang Hari Road in Muntinlupa City in 2026. Led by Chua, the move marked a new chapter for the brand, allowing it to reach more diners in southern Metro Manila while maintaining its signature contemporary Asian-fusion cuisine. Originally founded by Michelin-starred chef Andrew Walsh of Singapore's acclaimed Cure, Butcher Boy built its following at its former Makati location before relocating to Alabang to accommodate a bigger dining space and connect with a wider community. Its culinary approach combines Southeast Asian flavors with Western cooking techniques, offering dishes such as its signature chicken laksa dumplings, fried chicken bao, Asian tacos, pork adobo and a variety of steaks, alongside carefully crafted cocktails. The chicken laksa dumplings were among the dishes highlighted by Michelin inspectors. During the restaurant's grand opening, Marketing Head Aubrey S. Mojica described its concept as “where east meets west,” emphasizing that while the menu had been expanded, the restaurant remained committed to preserving the quality, atmosphere and dining experience that patrons had come to expect. Mojica also underscored the importance of customer service, saying the restaurant's identity goes beyond its food to include the experience it provides to diners. With its latest Michelin recognition, Butcher Boy strengthens its position in the Philippine dining scene, bringing its combination of Asian-fusion flavors, steaks and accessible dining to the Alabang community. Butcher Boy is located at Alabang West Parade, Daang Hari Road, Muntinlupa City. For reservations, call 0939-868-0531.